Kind of a question for the ladies

[Bahir]

I did a while ago and the result was both good and bad. Good: Under my hair (which was very thick and brownish) I had very defined and big calves(that they were big I already knew), and a big tibialis. Bad: The hair created an illusion of a tan, but with the hair gone so was the tan.

[rev]

I just use a trimmer with no guard. Your calves will look bigger without hair on them, I promise you that. As Bahir said, they'll be a bit pasty, so give them some time to tan out. I actually prefer my legs trimmed now, the ladies I've talked to seem to like it as well [img]/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[Raging Dragon]

I'll wait until I'm big enough to remove all of my chest hair. But it is a good question... And as others have said, it really depends on the woman you're interested in.

[X-Factor]

Honestly guys, after not shaving my chest for a few weeks and then doin it again the difference is night and day, as for calves the safest way for me is to get a trimmer and take them down to 1/2-1/4" and your good, it looks fine and you stay defined.

[vaberella]

Just so you have an idea. If you can get a picture of Pierce Brosnan's chest that's what I'm talking about. Nice hair you can still see the skin, with a lethal happy trail. I like chest hair..just not too much....get's between the teeth sometimes when your trying to be naughty. But quite nice...I like it..

The one thing though..back hair. Oh god, now that is vile!

[stephers081]

[ QUOTE ]
The one thing though..back hair. Oh god, now that is vile!

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally agree! Back hair is really gross. As for chest and leg hair (on guys), I think it's fine. I guess trimming leg hair is fine, just don't shave it all off!